Have you looked at the poll numbers for how many Democrats trust Trump as a source of information? Now narrow the sample from Democrats generally to frequent Democratic donors. The answer is common sense.https://twitter.com/anamariecox/status/1244741998529126413 …
-
-
Nobody is saying it is not a mistake to take fish tank cleaner. But the ingredient is the same. Now that you keep pushing this I will dig up the link and the exact screenshots that prove it. I did this all day several weeks ago.
-
I asked an actual pharmacist. He said they are the same. The only difference is the "salt" form (phosphate) requires a bigger dosage for the same effect. Let me see if I screen captured his response...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Trump touts chloroquine. By name. Link: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-briefing-6/ …. Screenshot below. CDC says chloroquine is chloroquine phosphate. Link: https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/resources/pdf/fsp/drugs/Chloroquine.pdf …. Screenshot below.pic.twitter.com/CrXtgKPKrZ
-
Well, he's correct. I mean, that's why it's been so readily approved for compassionate use all over the world and clinical trials could start so fast. Why wouldn't he say that? It's true.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Numerous links showing chloroquine phosphate, the exact compound in the fish tank cleaner and the same thing Trump touted, are the same.https://twitter.com/Patterico/status/1242533579919261696 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So: NO, I am not saying Trump said to drink fish tank cleaner. YES I am saying what he touted is the same compound in the fish tank cleaner. And NO you won't answer the first question I asked: what is your theory? Is the widow *lying* about hearing about this from Trump?
-
She poisoned him. And now she's immune from prosecution because Trump. Quite clever.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And as before, it's clear you won't answer the question I asked, I suspect because it's obvious to you now that there is no good answer to it. Her donations are obviously irrelevant if interesting.
-
You're the prosecutor here, with your case being that his statements directly led to her taking those compounds. The defense her has evidence that calls that into question. Showing she's in a group that wouldn't believe him if he said the sky was blue, or that 1+2=3, helps that.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.