If he literally just spent $10 billion planting trees, that would almost certainly be more useful than whatever he ends up doing. But then, that wouldn't be effective as ideological protection money.https://twitter.com/Quicktake/status/1229480960552554496 …
-
-
Conservation isn't sexy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This won't protect him from anything. There will still be people yelling "WHO IS HE TO DECIDE HOW TO SPEND THE MONEY HE SHOULD PAY TAXES INSTEAD"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Endowing some prizes and funding deployment to generate economies of scale could be useful, and potentially better than tree planting. Ditto roof greening in cities.
-
Like Gates, he's the rare philanthropist who has the resources to make a real difference by focusing on one thing, rather than just pouring money around.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Or he could fund the building of 13 nuclear power plants and really do something useful to combat carbon emissions.pic.twitter.com/th8WgpGNXK
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Better to throw the money at renewable tech and give away the patents
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What are Republicans good for if you won't even take national security seriously?
-
Nothing
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.