This is how you do it. No need to tear anything down. Build monuments to true American heroes.https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1227231106501660673 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The monuments were meant to glorify the Confederate cause, which is to say, the cause of slavery. I do not see how it is possible to support the permanence of such paeans to people who endorsed such a degenerate view. 1/
"I felt like anything rather than rejoicing at the downfall of a foe who had fought so long and valiantly, and had suffered so much for a cause, though that cause was, I believe, one of the worst for which a people ever fought, and one for which there was the least excuse." 2/
That’s due to you not being the intended intimidate-ee, just maybe.
It's an inconvenient belief, but it's a big part of why they were put up. I would just have stuck with "no statues for treason," but every reason they're up is a bad reason, we don't have to agree on all the bad reasons.
Satan, like Robert E. Lee, is a brilliant tactition. So why don't we have public monuments honoring Lucifer? Obvious answer: because tactical brilliance is good and praiseworthy to the extent that the tactitian's *ends* or goals are good. Satan's goals are evil. So were Lee's.
Dude a copy of Mein Kamf can function as a very useful doorstop. But its primary function is clear, and that alone is a good enough reason not to *celebrate* the book by, say, displaying it proudly at the local library. Or, at least, I would hope so.
Yes, it would be hard to maintain your opinion if you acknowledged the truth. Best to pretend.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.