This is a perfect specimen of a particular style of progressive Twitter: *Ad hominem; *No evidence offered; *Unearned condescension; and *Offense taken that a person you disagree with could be seen as intelligent. https://twitter.com/thor_benson/status/1149346346484273152 …
-
-
"Help us describe this thing that was justly & overwhelmingly rejected before, by changing the name so nobody looks up the history" is just such a classic of how progressives think.https://twitter.com/rmc031/status/1314249381831487489 …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I had to give up on his account. It's just utter nonsense with no self-awareness at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are you willing to apply this same judgement to those you wholeheartedly agree with, but who offer no sound or reasonable rationale for their statements?
-
Of course not
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There is no rationale, which is why you're resorting to an ad hominem attack.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn’t that your entire schtick?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We can’t consider it because the argument is illogical. Alexander said he believed Trump did exactly what the House Impeached him for. He then says it’s not impeachable but gives no justification for why not. What are we supposed to consider then?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And yet you are pro life.....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.