Depends a little on where Biden, Buttigieg, & Warren end up & whether anyone gets out after IA.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She has the same vulnerability in building a broad coalition like Buttigieg and Warren, but she’s certainly viable in NH (where her numbers are up despite limited resources paid to the stage) A third place stronger-than-expected finish would put her in the first tier
-
I'm not convinced there is time to ramp up the money & name recognition to compete on Super Tuesday off of third place, when neither NH nor SC nor NV is a natural win for her.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It won't be enough to keep her viable but it should be an indicator that Warren isn't either.
-
Let’s hope so.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Lot’s of INDY voters in NH will move to Klobuchar if she can become viable in Iowa (15%).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can someone explain to me why even focus on campaigning in Iowa? The max delegates the winner will get is. 20 (with 2nd getting 15) where New York is 279 and winner take all. Seems so foolish to spend resources in low delegate states, especially if it’s not winner take all
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agreed. Even if she does finish 3rd, it seems more likely that it's followed up by, say, 4th place in NH, and then a dropout.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Warren is pretty annoying.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But it would still be sweet to knock the Des Moines Register’s chosen one down a notch.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.