The idea that candidates are supposed to police the "promoting" of media figures is a "wet streets cause rain" argument. Sure, there are the Alex Joneses & Al Sharptons of the world, but for the most part, you hunt where the ducks are.https://twitter.com/JimSwiftDC/status/1220754614875836423 …
You're not answering the question. Who practiced that kind of politics & won? What president would *not* have touted the endorsement of arguably the most popular figure in an entire category of media?
-
-
Your response was about "The idea that candidates are supposed to police the "promoting" of media figures..." I told you he promoted it. Maybe you weren't aware at the time. That's what I was saying was bad.
-
You changed the subject to the history of controversy. And I don't care about that. My opinion is that this is bad, and Joe Rogan is bad. You clearly disagree with me, and that is fine.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Jim’s point isn’t reject the endorsement. But don’t celebrate it on your own feed. If you do that, you own Rohan’s bigotry.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.