Dan McLaughlin Retweeted Conor Friedersdorf
I am shocked, shocked to find her reading your article in obvious bad faith.https://twitter.com/conor64/status/1214661773078323200 …
Dan McLaughlin added,
Conor FriedersdorfVerified account @conor64
My claim was not, *The 1619 Project should've been about people of every race & was exclusionary bc it wasn't* but that 1619 is a less inclusive "true founding" than 1776. I don't think the project should've been "about everybody else." Just that the "founding" claim is wrong. https://twitter.com/nhannahjones/status/1214577526053523456 …
1:49 PM - 8 Jan 2020
0 replies
3 retweets
15 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.