I'm not in favor of tearing down monuments in the United States, or bombing them elsewhere.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Cultural sites, like civilians, become more legit targets if they are used to shield weapons of war. But as with civilians, their presence should & does give us pause. That's different from targeting such sites to inflict pain. https://twitter.com/gm5626/status/1214013884073426944 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
In both the 1848 siege of Rome and the 1870-71 siege of Paris, European governments raised high alarms against the besieging party shelling the cities. Europe got past that by the 1940s, but a lot was lost along the way.
Show this thread -
In 1860, the British & French deliberately torched the Summer Palace in Beijing, a great architectural loss. Lord Elgin justified it on the theory that their grievance was with the Emperor, not his people. But history has judged that harshly.
Show this thread -
Oh, indeed there are. And frankly, I suspect a good deal of this is Trump blustering just because people are telling him he can't do something. But it's useful to lay down the marker on what we should not do.https://twitter.com/RadioFreeTom/status/1214015819375632389 …
Show this thread -
It would, as usual, be helpful if Trump didn't talk about stuff like this in this way (not just on Twitter).
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We also shouldn’t target ambulances. But when Iran-backed groups use them to transport belligerents to attack sites...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If we are going to inflict a given amount of pain on an enemy by bombing I would rather we do it by destroying cultural artifacts than by killing people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.