Unilateral disarmament is not wise. Biden would be getting much more blowback for his position if republicans were actually interested in holding a fair trial were both parties were allowed to call who they wanted.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Except for one thing. In a trial, you can’t just call anybody as a witness right? Wouldn’t someone file a motion about a lack of germaneness? And given that there is not one shred evidence this is anything but a delusion of Trump’s, Biden has 0 relevance.
-
Resisting witness subpoenas on relevance grounds alone, in an inquiry as broad as impeachment, is a serious uphill battle.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Fun story: Joe Biden was not impeached by the House, and my understanding was this thing was about Ukrainian corruption and not the Bidens. Or which set of talking points is the GOP working from now? Please advise.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is Biden a witness to Trump’s behavior or actions with regards to the Articles of Impeachment?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Biden doesn't work for the government and has no information about the relevant facts on impeachment. If he's subpoenaed regarding an investigation of his actions as VP, he should testify.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Let's subpoena baseballcrank about his involvement in pizzagate. You had no involvement, you say!? Well, then if you have nothing to hide, why not testify!?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not being a relevant fact witness to the matter under consideration is an excellent reason not to testify. Why are you pretending you don't already know this?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.