The Times goes all-in on the 1619 Project's factually misleading history. Notable here: when push comes to shove, the expertise of liberal academics who have studied these issues for a lifetime & earned widespread acclaim gives way to the imperatives of ideology. https://twitter.com/pegobry/status/1208189884139220993 …
-
-
Especially when they focus on the things they're credentialed & respected in, rather than using them as a roving commission https://twitter.com/BenSharmaTO/status/1208195228584284161 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
The bottom line in all this is that you are not going to get an intellectually honest debate from the NY Times Opinion section. What you'll get is people who hand-wave or smear anyone who offers inconvenient facts.
Show this thread -
Siding with Calhoun over Lincoln out loud. https://twitter.com/imillhiser/status/1208212931881709568 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
As a human I've learned you can find someone to say absolutely anything. So when "journalists" write, "some say...," it's purely editorial.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep. Its what I call “The No Bullshit Zone”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.