Opinion advocacy that isn't just horserace punditry should, as a general rule, have a point of view, a desired end state. Sometimes you can be frank that your end state is infeasible (libertarians are sometimes like this). Readers may have to infer it if you won't say it.
-
-
Obviously they weren’t shooting at one another, but the danger in everyone’s mind wasn’t profligate potty-mouthed Twitter trolls. And he left the Whigs, not because it was dying, but because it was becoming a platform for the Know Nothings, which has an eerie similarity to now
-
And by 1856, he wanted to put it in the ground.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.