I'm not arguing against all criticism of one's friends; I've never written anywhere that took that stance. But choices of tone & emphasis & narrative are pretty easy to detect in opinion writing; who is treated as a friend in need of correction, who a foe.https://twitter.com/Timodc/status/1204503787362234370 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No Trump supporter, regardless of their past history, is credible as a proper guardian of the rule of law. Period. The right has proven they can't & won't stand for principle if they anticipate *any* political price for doing so from the rightwing base. Too weak to be trusted.
End of conversation
-
-
-
The issue isn’t about the last “several decades” - its the “last few years” that’s of immediate concern
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please, write out this case you have for Dems being a bigger threat to the rule of law and the constitution than Trump's GOP
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Uh, I have bad news for you, then. They’re all we’ve got now.
-
I'm reading this alongside a vid of Pompeo nodding along to Lavrov's denial of election interference. Is Dan SURE about this idea that GOPs are "compatible" with the Constitution? Sure seems like they're getting ready to steal another election. I don't see Dems doing that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.