-
-
He’s represented by Larry Klayman and writing in American Thinker, so
6 replies 4 retweets 120 likesShow this thread -
-
-
Replying to @janecoaston @cjane87
So, you have no view on whether the prosecution actually used an impostor witness?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank
Based on Klayman’s involvement, I’m, shall we say, “skeptical."
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @janecoaston @baseballcrank
Jane Coaston Retweeted
Googling “what’s beyond ‘skeptical’” https://twitter.com/HashtagGriswold/status/1202965366001012742 …
Jane Coaston added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I assumed none of this is Zimmerman's work. What I find striking is that now that it's in court, there's not really a middle ground between "this lawsuit is a huge fraud on the court" and "this lawsuit shows the prosecution presented a huge fraud on the court." Put up or shut up.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.