No. This is totally wrong re the research part, Zaid. He’s is a very deep and wide ranging reader and he cites the texts he reads. This couldn’t be more mistaken.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
What I’m saying is that he has read and understood countless books—he has a scholars depth regarding US history and has read much else. So the crack about wiki/social media is just completely wrong.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Look—not going to go around with you on this. You claimed he was doing “research” from valid Wiki/social media hits. That’s just untrue. It’s a cheap shot. It’s false.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Columnists get paid because many human beings enjoy reading and the columnists write good things to read. Why do actors get paid? Similar reason. But they generally have to be good looking.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don’t know what you’re talking about. He’s not a clown. You’re both wrong about his columns which are deeo and learned. He’s read the Federalist, doesn’t make absurdly inaccurate remarks about impeachment without knowing wtf he’s talking about. Again, David, have some modesty.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
His columns on the origins of the electoral college are a good example of someone who knows enough of the history to mislead his readers by leaving out huge & decisive swaths of the facts.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.