Democrats would be far worse off than had they not had public hearings at all. Would be a massive boon to Trump re-elect & get GOP Senators out of a tight spot. I just can't imagine how they can afford to do that.https://twitter.com/allahpundit/status/1197986832056770566 …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The ones in the tough spot are the Dems that won in districts Trump won.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also, the polling I've seen are from before the Sondland/Hill-Holmes hearings. I'd wait to see if they sunk through. Sondland's testimony got WIDE front-page coverage.
-
Also-also Democrats have a good general election base motivator in a vote to impeach and make this the senate's problem: "We carried out the will of the people. The senate wouldn't do their job. You have a chance to override them."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What is more politically risky for purple districts? Pushing or abandoning an impeachment that the rabid "resistance" left wants but a majority of Americans don't think is warranted?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This seems right to me. Anything less will cost the D's dearly. And the R's will not convict. Of course I am an idiot so it should concern you that I agree
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm completely confident the hearings weren't scheduled until Pelosi had the votes for Articles.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What “trajectory of the polls”?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.