Manchin is the only one I'd be that sure about, but if the Democratic endgame is to use the removal vote to win Senate seats from incumbent Rs, it's essential for them to not have multiple defectors from their own caucus. If Sinema votes no, it insulates McSally.https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/1194640367502659586 …
-
-
I mean, some people would say that not ignoring obvious corruption is good policy and worth doing on its own.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jones most likely lose regardless. What real seats would be in danger? McSally is awful. she prob loses regardless
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The endgame is to get rid of a leader who is abusing his office for personal gain. Focus, people. Country over party.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
im here for the republican flop sweat.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And to stop Trump from naming a new SC justice if an opening happens.
-
They can't & won't stop that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Should they be worried about losing an incumbent D seat? I mean, I'm not "worried" about that but ...
-
Jones is toast anyway. He's probably the only one up in 2020 for whom this would matter.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.