Important to keep track of which witnesses have personal knowledge of which facts, especially when they start drawing sweeping conclusions. However, most legal cases are built on the *combination* of testimony by people who can speak to different parts of the case.https://twitter.com/MarkMeadows/status/1194655948561932288 …
-
-
More particularly, the general test for the admission of hearsay is whether there are indicia of reliability - statements made in the regular course of business, present sense impressions, and statements which might expose the speaker to liability are some of the classic examples
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Those values include fairness for the accused and openness to the public, values repeatedly sabotaged by the ‘prosecution’ in this case.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seriously Dan. This is a process to wipe out the votes of millions of Americans. And this is a sham. The people testifying are saying I heard that so and so said that so and so thought and on and on. Dangerous game being played with our country. (1 of 2)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(2). Coincidence that everyone who has spoken in these first two hours has been a graduate of Harvard except Jim Jordan.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.