1. Some good points here, but mixes some apples & oranges. "Motive" is a slippery standard for impeachment; issue should be whether he used public power for objectively improper purposes.https://twitter.com/AstorAaron/status/1191428248196046849 …
-
-
4. By contrast, there are longstanding bodies of law, on which the Founders drew, prohibiting public men from misappropriating public powers mainly for private gain. The advantage of using that lens is that the inquiry doesn't require speculation about POTUS' state of mind.
Show this thread -
5. Misappropriation of this nature is sometimes covered by criminal statutes (hence, why Article II mentions Bribery explicitly) but the Framers did not want impeachments to be limited to strictly criminal bribery.
Show this thread -
6. We return to my continuing point: abuse of power for personal gain is a political, not legal, basis for impeaching an elected president. It therefore requires bipartisan public legitimacy - especially when the voters get to weigh in on him in a year. That doesn't exist (yet).
Show this thread -
7. Unless & until a majority of Republican voters - or at least, majorities in multiple states with R Senators - believes that Trump should be removed from office for abuse of power, their elected Senators are not going to do it.
Show this thread -
8. So: if you want Trump impeached & removed from office, no amount of yelling at Republican Senators is going to get you there. Take your case to the voters.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
^hard^impossible
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.