Except be didn't say "one sided" He called it a lynching. You don't have to do this. You don't HAVE to defend him. You can make other choices.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So the House will be asked to vote on an impeachment without seeing the evidence predicating the vote?
-
They can if they choose to. They could impeach him for having ridiculous hair. But the Senate decides.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Where the standard includes multiple on-air confessions, text messages & other documentary evidence of quid pro quo bribery, soliciting election help from foreign states & dealings with mob figures. It’s an peculiar standard but useful for the Trump cult formerly known as the GOP
End of conversation
-
-
-
So why has it not been done this secretive before? Hint: they don’t even have a crime. 2) Impeachment should never be done behind the people back. Your neverTrump, inside the beltway punditry is absurd
-
It's being done secretly to prevent Nunes and others from running information back to the WH to help them obstruct justice - something he did several times during the Mueller investigation when he had the chair.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Is that how the Clinton impeachment was handled? No, it wasn't. So...Republicans provide more sue process and reasonableness to their opponents than Democrats. At least admit that much.
-
The Republicans wanted to expose all of the details in order to embarrass Clinton. There's no need to embarrass Trump (he's embarrassing enough already) so they're choosing discretion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not like a grand jury if only a select few can hear the evidence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.