A quid pro quo with a foreign leader *for the benefit of the United States* is, of course, both appropriate & common. But that just brings us back to whether Trump was using U.S. influence to benefit the U.S., or to benefit himself.
"A benefit to the US is defacto a benefit to a sitting president." True. But not true the other way around.
-
-
We demanded help looking into 2016 election interference & dems twist is to sound like he admitted to the nonexistent quid-pro-quo to investigate 2020 dems. It is apparent when they are over the target. The hysteria grows.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.