One, Obama would have delegated that to Harry Reid. Two, the media would have focused entirely on "if Romney has nothing to hide, why doesn't he welcome a Chinese investigation?" Three, Obama would then have mocked Romney for calling China a threat, to wild applause.https://twitter.com/TimAlberta/status/1180089216715374593 …
-
-
You’re really comparing Obama to Trump? You found one example when Reid lied and Obama didn’t call him out and from that you’re extrapolating that he might have enlisted the Chinese to investigate Romney?
-
Um, Harry Reid lied about Romney’s taxes, admitted he did to help Obama, no one called him out.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Which is irrelevant to the discussion at hand
End of conversation
-
-
-
Reid falsely accuses Romney of having paid no taxes =/= asking an authoritarian state to investigate your political opponent and interfere in the upcoming election. I mean Jesus, how are those situations even remotely comparable?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I can get behind everything but the Harry Reid was a thug part.
. Like most Dems, he looks more competent in retrospect, but he was pretty craven.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Obama did not stop Reid from doing "ugly" things campaigning = Trump called on our main global adversary to ratf*ck Biden and promised they won't be caught or sanctioned. No difference. Rest my case.
@TimAlbertaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He was also totally fine with his VP’s ugly “Romney is going to put black people back in chains” smear.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.