And this doesn’t prove a conspiracy at all. It just proves the whistleblower was concerned his complaints wouldn’t be listened to.
-
-
-
Conspiracies don’t need proof. Or context. Or meaning. They just need to exist in the world and Republicans will believe them with all their hearts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And this is supposed to matter because? I’m genuinely curious why this would have any relevance to anything. It makes sense to me that a WB would seek guidance from an Intel committee.
-
It doesn’t matter. They can’t actually defend the president’s conduct, nor can they really attack Schiff’s handling of it, so they just have to make vague accusations in hopes of manufacturing some sort of scandal
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I hope the
@JonahNRO and@DavidAFrench of the world acknowledge what is painfully obvious now. Without a Quid pro Quo and with this revelation, this is an obvious setup just like the Russia investigation.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What does this change?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You had enough characters to add "and Schiff handled exactly how a member of Congress should handle such a request for guidance, especially about such a serious matter"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Haven't trusted the MSM since 2016 and have been right since.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep and now it explains a lot more. This is another political hit on Trump.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Tell me what protocols your talking about, cause the article says no such thing.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.