Frightening is more like it. Does he honestly think NYT readers are dumb enough to believe this?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Some other crank wrote this, but it’s appearing under Krugman’s twitter handle. Weird.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is impressively inane. To the point it’s not clear where to start. You’ve found a whole new gear since your party was outed as being nakedly pro-treason. A++
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Paul Krugman is a fraud of the first order!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I see how this is going to go. If Trump refuses to leave the WH you're going to be too defensive to say anything about it. Instead you'll criticize whatever hypocrisy you ascribe to Krugman's reaction and consider your work done.
-
If Trump refuses to leave office he’ll say Gore did it first so bothsides.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I know right?? It’s not like he’s ever threatened not to leave office or anything? Crazy libs amiright???https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-loves-to-say-he-may-not-leave-office-848799/amp/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There's a big difference between not accepting the results of an election when you don't hold the office and refusing to leave one you currently occupy. I don't think it's likely, but there's at least a small chance he tries it, at least temporarily.
-
Sure, but you're just highlighting the difference. Trump *hasn't* done the one. Krugman has done the other
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Your anti-anti-fascism bias is reaching new levels. Clouding your judgement.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.