There are some things worth investigating in the origins of this, but at the end of the day, either facts are true or not, and the whistleblower - having no firsthand knowledge to testify about - is irrelevant to what is or isn't true.https://twitter.com/JonahDispatch/status/1178854512901136385 …
-
-
Dan, you are wrong. The call dealt with relations with a new president, the dismissal of the ambassador, US military support and Ukraine buying more US oil. The CrowdStrike mention is totally appropriate bc it speaks to ongoing investigation into 2016 collusion hoax
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You might have a point on (3), but I am unclear on what role there is. Giuliani said he was asked by the State Dept., but I suppose time will tell. As to your other points, I think you're just wrong. Most of the call was congratulating the president, the Ukraine... 1/2
-
... and Trump didn't ask anyone to investigate a US citizen that I saw. Maybe I'm wrong. 2/2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Four, the investigation that DOJ *is* working on amounts 2 asking foreign intel services to help advance Nunes’ war on US intel services/FBI
-
Attacking US institutions like the FBI or NSA is worse than attacking US politicians even if Barr gave it the DOJ’s official sanction
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.