Note for readers: this has already been debunked. The whistleblower rules weren't changed, and, of course, if you look at the whistleblower statute, it never had a requirement limiting complaints to those with first-hand knowledge. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1178651638313226240 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Sudar, you need to read the Daily Beast article to understand the debate we are having. Dan isn't being dense, he's pushing back--and honest push-back is always appreciated. But as my article noted, which form, if any, doesn't matter--it's the policy. But form raised issue.pic.twitter.com/00JgQEf7qx
End of conversation
-
-
-
Hey Dan, I've read the piece and it does show that in 2018 the second-hand was included, but that ignores the point of my article, in which I expressly said, which form, if any, was used is irrelevant. WHAT matters is whether the IG's office accepted complaints based on 1/
-
2/ only on first-hand info before and then changed the policy. The except I included suggests the IG only accepted based on first hand. Was that the policy? Under Obama? Was it changed after Trump won? That's point one.pic.twitter.com/oC9ikNPdnp
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.