“It’s silly to say criminals should get away with crimes, but you really have to wonder about all those masses of government officials when they feel empowered to go after gangsters, dangerous criminals, treasonous actors, and threats to the rule of law.”
There's a good deal more than that, but we'd be here all day and get quickly into things I'm not at liberty to write about.
-
-
But this all still very much feels like a corrupt, lying, selfish narcissist of a man made continually dumb moves, was boorish, awful to deal with, didn't read, White House staff felt he was an incorrigible baby, and a loose cannon who had to be talked out of DANGEROUS things...
-
So the ends justify any means? Finding the man reprehensible is not grounds to upend our representative government with unelected and independent government officials.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
... all that, and is it any wonder that some officials and intelligence people speak badly of him - and yes, even speak of him as a pretty dangerous person, even a threat, who might someday need to face accountability?
-
100% There is no policy making process to push back against. To the extent there is institutional resistance, it’s largely procedural, bc there is no plan. I’m glad career civil servants are softening dangerous lurches in US policy based on an unstable C i C. (If they are)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
....and yet even given these EXTREMELY UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES where the White House occupant has the maturity & intellect of a 4th grader, people still cite a 'deep state' because some reasonable White House members noted that he was a moron and found him dangerous & unstable
-
This is such a good point
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.