You will notice - and this latest controversy is by no means the only example - the pattern: 1. "Release X! X will bring down Trump!" 2. X comes out, isn't what we were promised. 3. "We told you releasing just X was a coverup! Release Y! It's not a real investigation until..."
-
-
Readout of the call is somewhat ambiguous as to whether Trump actually asked Zelensky to investigate the Bidens or just cooperate with a US investigation, but it certainly appears that Zelensky interpreted it as the former, & Trump rolled with it:pic.twitter.com/3d2B9tp133
Show this thread -
Yeah, and this gets back to my point about reading the readout impressionistically, as it would be received in a back-and-forth conversationhttps://twitter.com/gabrielmalor/status/1176929195093610496 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The plural form of "communication" is also "communication".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Apparently the transcribers are from the CIA. Maybe one of the transcribers was spreading gossip around the CIA.
-
A president's calls are not transcribed. There is no transcription.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Right above a footnote pointing out that the memo has been specifically redrafted to avoid references to still-classified matters. This isn't a sufficient basis on which to conclude that the whistleblower was only talking about the Zelenskyy call.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.