After weeks of hearing what a sharp lawyer David French is, it’s kind of shocking to read he doesn’t understand that the transcript (even assuming it is accurate and complete) is not at all dispositive. The complaint is said to contain much more information than re this call.https://twitter.com/DavidAFrench/status/1176663313201188864 …
Predicate & evidence are two different things. You're knocking David as a lawyer for making a distinction that comes naturally to lawyers.
-
-
David is commenting on tactical maneuvers by politicians, so the criticism is fair game.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No! That wasn’t the point of his remark at all. It was a statement of political strategy—of course the transcript isn’t the central document here. Maybe I should have said that, as a lawyer, he’s not a very sharp strategist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.