One reason for this is that House Democrats can be blamed for the decision to hold impeachment proceedings; the Senate just has to vote Yes or No. Another is that there's a lot more Ds in swing House districts. But for Gardner, or Collins, an impeachment vote is lose-lose.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Outside of Doug Jones, who is toast anyway without another miracle, I can't see a Senate Democrat up in 2020 who would have a real downside to voting for impeachment.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
By and large this will be true. I think gun grabbing will do more for the GOP between the coasts.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Trump's lawlessness is so extreme, that an impeachment vote helps Democrats in BOTH houses... This isn't 1999 and lying about a blowjob.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I can’t wait for you all to work through the antithesis to see what the synthesis is going to be.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems like a terrible move across the board for the dems. I don’t think the case has ever been weaker and popular support has never been less. When there was ambiguity with the whole Russia debacle the dems case was better-ish. The dems appear to be grasping at anything now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes & no. One Senate seat is worth a lot more than, say, five House seats.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.