I think David has decisively won the argument on legal rights, legal strategy & the Constitution. The counter-argument is what to do 1) in politics/policy areas not constrained by Con Law or 2) in the culture broadly. But that risks agreement in lieu of argument.
-
-
It always comes down to free speech[or insert whatever] for me, but not for thee. Suderman hit the nail on the head a few months ago. For people like MBD and Sohrab, it’s about acquiring the power to shut down forms of behavior that dislike. Plain and simple.
-
I dislike theft. I suppose that’s just my irrational private bias “stuff I don’t like.”
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Viewpoint neutrality is largely incoherent and inconsistently applied, mainly because the ‘neutral’ view presumes acceptance of pre-agreed principles and the line between speech and conduct is so illusory. Is it viewpoint discrimination to say “you can’t wear drag in a library”?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.