The reason some folks on the Right don't trust @DavidAFrench is that he would never write something like this https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/09/no-brett-kavanaugh-has-not-been-credibly-accused/ …
-
-
Replying to @baseballcrank @DavidAFrench
Actually it’s a perfect example of what people object to—the notion that any of this legitimately has to do with burden of proof or evidence or sexual assault or
#MeToo
. It’s a vile, craven and coordinated attempt to destroy a man whose only crime was being nominated by Trump.1 reply 3 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @julie_kelly2 @DavidAFrench
So your plan is to convince people that the charge is bogus by...not addressing the charge or the evidence???
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank @DavidAFrench
No and by the way, Mollie Hemingway is the one who forced the correction. But it’s only part of the outrage—French overlooks the bigger picture
2 replies 3 retweets 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The evidence against Roy Moore was, in fact, substantial.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
The problem is, you can't always have a legal process in time for an election. There was no legal process for claims against Bill Clinton in 1992 or 1996. Does he just get a pass, then? Or do we, as voters, have an obligation to weigh the evidence?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.