Don't expect liberals to let facts get in the way of their revisionist history
-
-
-
Nathan Nunn is one of the sources cited, yet that fine scholar seems to specialize in Africa, not slavery in US. The use of a paper by Olmstead and Rhode is curious as it says right on it NOT to use as a citation. This is an evolving field; open minded folks invite new outlooks!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How embarrassing. They'll have to unperson several historians before it becomes true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
NY Times is still falling for Democrat slave owners propaganda from the Civil War era. Just as they fall for Democrat propaganda today.
-
Slavery was supported by the majority of Americans, regardless of party. Republicans had zero influence until after election of 1856. The “Blame the Democrats” rhetoric sounds like the excuses of the South before AND after Civil War.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nathan Nunn is one of the sources cited, yet that fine scholar seems to specialize in Africa, not slavery in US. The use of a paper by Olmstead and Rhode is curious as it says right on it NOT to use as a citation. This is an evolving field; open minded folks invite new outlooks!
-
To use the term "open minded" in the same context that critiques a discredited theme promoted by
@nytimes , that bastion of open-mindedness―pause for audience laughter―takes conflation to a whole new level. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And that kids is why the Confederates won the Civil War
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.