This is predictable banality. Gun control advocates-*read the literature*, not tweets—constantly say that both the Constitution and case law (specifically Scalia’s opinion in Heller) uphold the right to regulate firearms and to limit some kinds of firearms. So permitting (1)https://twitter.com/Neoavatara/status/1168357892531150849 …
It's also hard for failure to argue with successhttps://www.nationalreview.com/corner/will-banning-bump-stocks-lead-gun-bans/ …
-
-
But what is “success” here? The GOP is behind both public opinion and simple policy logic here. What night actually mitigate gun violence. MA shows that permitting does do that—not confiscation, but permitting. How about trying to mitigate the problem? And stay with public
-
opinion too? And seriously, the no retreat logic completely obtained (and still does! No matter the political cost) on health care. You all said no on everything. Next time, Dems won’t bother schmoozing Grassley or Snow, if she’s still around.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.