You may have me confused with someone else. I've typically worked with actual election results (eg, 1888, 1860) or a state-by-state hypothetical where the Democrat loses 48 states by identical 54-46 margins using 2016 turnout. My argument doesn't depend on county results.
How many advanced democracies choose a head of government by national popular vote?
-
-
They’re parliamentary systems. But you go beyond defending the EC. You don’t think we should even reform the system as a whole—so we should let national elections be governed by partisan state officials? How does that make any sense? And to the extent the constitution itself
-
limits reform, that’s a grave flaw in the constitution and nothing to be extolled.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.