But “president by ten arbitrarily contested states out of 50+ DC” *is* how we elect presidents. (The states may change, but not the logic.) In a country of 200 million eligible voters spread across a continent and beyond, that’s shrewdly empowering to we, the people!https://twitter.com/baseballcrank/status/1167951035127582720 …
-
-
That’s interesting as a matter of political history, but it doesn’t change the normative point. In a presidential system (as opposed to a parliamentary one), votes should be weighted the same. Change the rules and it’s hard to know who would have gotten the most votes in such a
-
A page of political history is worth a volume of normative logic.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.