2. Bouie also begins & ends his history of gerrymandering with Republicans in the past decade, ignoring the vast history of Democrat gerrymanders. In 2009, Democrats had 15 more House seats than their share of the popular vote - without which Obamacare doesn't pass.
-
Show this thread
-
3. Bouie's history of Walker-era Wisconsin power struggles ignores the unprecedented Democrat efforts to recall Walker, have the legislative minority flee the state, surround the capitol with angry mobs, & sic investigators on conservative donors.
2 replies 14 retweets 52 likesShow this thread -
4. This is aside from the oddity of including, in a series on black Americans, a jeremiad against any political structure that defends the rights of the minority. I wonder if America has ever had minorities oppressed by the majority.
2 replies 10 retweets 47 likesShow this thread -
5.
@johnddavidson also notes that Calhounist views of the American Founding have more in common with today's progressivism & the 1619 Project than they do with modern conservatism https://thefederalist.com/2019/08/20/ghost-john-c-calhoun-haunts-todays-american-left/ … &https://thefederalist.com/2017/08/03/confederacy-still-lingers-within-progressivism-birthed/ …4 replies 19 retweets 36 likesShow this thread -
6. Then there is Bouie's history of Reaganism, which consists entirely of a quote about the 1991 David Duke campaign that is so hilariously ahistorical regarding the environment of 1980 & 1984, it's hard to believe anyone who lived through that era wouldn't laugh at it.
2 replies 13 retweets 49 likesShow this thread -
7. Bouie's view that Bill Buckley only rethought his view on civil rights "when key civil rights questions had been settled by law" also has the timeline of Buckley's evolution wrong, unless Bouie thinks these things had been settled by the mid-60shttps://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/05/13/william-f-buckley-civil-rights-215129 …
3 replies 10 retweets 35 likesShow this thread -
8. I'm not sure how you write this paragraph without pulling a hamstring.pic.twitter.com/aecf8mOtis
4 replies 8 retweets 39 likesShow this thread -
9. Also, in ascribing Calhounism as the source of anti-majoritarianism in American politics, Bouie ignores the role of "living constitution" judges & the administrative state, both of which derive from the anti-majoritarian theories of white supremacist Woodrow Wilson.
2 replies 10 retweets 42 likesShow this thread -
10. Now, Calhoun began with a germ of truth: the American system runs on multiple tracks - the president, Senate, House, & states each answer to separate electorates. Those distinct majorities can each, within limits, obstruct the others. But that's not why Calhoun's wrong.
1 reply 5 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
11. The federal system, including the provision of a written & amendable constitution, ultimately allows large or lasting majorities to override all opposition. Calhoun clung to a pre-1787, anti-originalist view that the concurrent systems had an absolute veto.
1 reply 5 retweets 25 likesShow this thread
12. To belabor the obvious, Calhoun was also bad on the merits - he also turned away from the Founders' view of slavery & embraced it as a positive good.
-
-
13. Antebellum South Carolina was also uniquely bad. Bouie describes it as "the paradigmatic slave state" but it was more the extreme example. From 1828-60 it was the only state that held no popular vote for POTUS. Its state government was likewise out of step w/even the South.
2 replies 4 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
14. Anyway, there are deeper issues w/transporting Calhounism to the modern GOP while totally whitewashing the entire history of the Democratic Party outside the South & the modern progressive posture towards popular sovereignty & constitutional government, but you get the idea.
1 reply 8 retweets 26 likesShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.