I can’t imagine a version of America so rickety that a magazine package detailing the history of one of the institutions most critical to both its founding and its remaking would be detrimental.
-
-
I’m doing the thing where I say that talking about the impact of slavery on American life is no more divisive than “the impact of slavery on American life” and talking about the history of slavery is a positive good.
-
It’s not “anti-American,” nor is it “Pravda esque,” or is it “demoralizing” unless American history is, itself, demoralizing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It would only be an issue if said publication had just talked about reworking it's entire reporting wing to focus on the racism of their political opponents.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wish I were naive enough to believe that an "examination" of American slavery coming out in 2019 weren't agenda-driven and influenced. Yeah, I miss that childhood me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your party has been making it harder for people to vote for two decades now because it can otherwise no longer maintain power. Once you stop attacking the foundation of democracy you may have some moral standing to punch left, not before then.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
He's a crank. He turns his head. Doesn't live in the threads.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Are you doing the thing where Conservatives ignore the reality of history and cling to some ignorantly halcyon view of life?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The good faith engager has logged on
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.