Opposition to nativism, protectionism, isolationism, authoritarianism, corruption, and perversion. Support for free enterprise, free trade, the Western Alliance, human freedom, dignity, equality, rationality, and morality. @JonahNRO @TheRickWilson @BretStephensNYT @HeathMayo
-
-
Replying to @robert_zubrin @julie_kelly2 and
Yes, I will gladly take the second menu over the first. So did most of the GOP until 2016, and so would most of the party again with better leadership.
7 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank @robert_zubrin and
You guys have had three years to come up with an alternative policy agenda that embodies all of those vague “principles” and find someone to primary Trump. You failed again while seeing Trump as the cause, not the symptom, for widespread dissatisfaction in GOP for years
9 replies 8 retweets 62 likes -
Replying to @julie_kelly2 @robert_zubrin and
The failure to find a viable primary challenger to HW Bush in 1992 did not mean that he was in good shape for re-election or lacking in policy mistakes.
6 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank @robert_zubrin and
Let’s stay on topic not go back nearly 30 years. Dan, let’s say Trump wasn’t running - who is your ideal candidate to beat the Dems next year?
1 reply 0 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @julie_kelly2 @robert_zubrin and
If he wasn't running at all? Ideally, Haley. But I'd be fine with Pence - especially if he was running as an incumbent. Nearly anybody but Roy Moore or Steve King would be an improvement on Trump.
11 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank @robert_zubrin and
Do you think either could beat Warren or Sanders or Harris?
8 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @julie_kelly2 @baseballcrank and
Not to parachute in on this conversation, but serious question: Do you think Trump will?pic.twitter.com/dTSmb3uqHj
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EggerDC @baseballcrank and
That’s not convincing. Registered voters and there’s no link to the methodology. Why are Dems spending tens of millions early in MI, PA, and WI if they think Trump is easily beatable?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @julie_kelly2 @baseballcrank and
I certainly don't think it's open-and-shut. But it seems Democrats have learned their lesson about thinking they can win without playing after the debacle of 2016. I don't see how them going hard where they slacked off before is supposed to show a Trump victory is likelier.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
You play all the way to the whistle. In 1972, the Nixon campaign broke into the Democratic headquarters in the Watergate. That meant Nixon was terrified of losing. It didn't mean he *was* losing. He carried 49 states & 60% of the vote.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.