The failure to find a viable primary challenger to HW Bush in 1992 did not mean that he was in good shape for re-election or lacking in policy mistakes.
-
-
That’s what you fundamentally don’t get about politics. This isn’t a court of law, your being a lawyer is irrelevant and winning elections over a far Left Democratic Party night require enlisting ppl you find icky
-
Exactly. Candidates don't come from an a la carte menu. We have to pick from those who choose to run. I doubt any other 2016 candidate would have beaten Hillary. If you make perfection the minimum standard, you're destined to always lose.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What??? Any (good) Lawyer will tell you its much harder to defend the innocent - the consequences and pressure are exponentially higher
-
You are talking about the stakes and stress. Dan is talking about the evidence. Give me a client with no confession, no gun in a search, no dna, no prints, no eyewitnesses, etc. and I have a lot more to work with. Trump’s “honesty” and his lies get him in trouble all the time.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
zzzzzzzzzzzz
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cruz was my guy. The reaction by Repubs towards him removed any naïveté I had about that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.