Oh heavens, @MaxBoot, you should have tried reading the whole article. You might have started by reading the title. This is just embarrassing, & not for me.https://twitter.com/RichLowry/status/1161454357189206017 …
-
Show this thread
-
I seriously would like to know whether
@MaxBoot even read the title of my article, let alone its text & conclusions, before quoting it. I cannot imagine he did.11 replies 5 retweets 62 likesShow this thread -
Still no word on whether
@MaxBoot even read the title of my article, let alone its text & conclusions, before characterizing it falsely in@washingtonpost. A reasonable observer would have to conclude that he did not.4 replies 10 retweets 40 likesShow this thread -
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted Rich Lowry
This is one of the passages that I'd be inerested to know if
@MaxBoot or his editors@washingtonpost read before publishing a false characterization of my piece.https://twitter.com/RichLowry/status/1161454854679777280 …Dan McLaughlin added,
Rich LowryVerified account @RichLowryOne sentence from the piece: “We see that in the tone of hysteria that creeps into immigration conversations: not just traditional fears of crime and ghettos or clashes of language or culture, but screeds about ‘invasion’ or, worse, ‘white genocide.’”Show this thread5 replies 11 retweets 34 likesShow this thread -
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted Rich Lowry
That appears to be the case not only for him but also his editors, if he has any. Which.... https://reason.com/2019/08/08/was-charging-sarah-palin-with-complicity-in-mass-murder-an-honest-mistake/ …https://twitter.com/RichLowry/status/1161693686826184705 …
Dan McLaughlin added,
Rich LowryVerified account @RichLowryWhat@charlescwcooke posits in here sounds right.@MaxBoot did some quick googling for his column accusing NR of white nationalism, read the subhead of the@baseballcrank article, didn’t bother to read the piece and fired away Max Boot’s Dishonesty https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/08/max-boots-dishonesty/ …Show this thread1 reply 6 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted
Me: hey Max, did you even *read* my column before you claimed that it "flirted with the 'great replacement' theory espoused by the El Paso gunman"? Max: LOL u mad bro? Sad to see open trolling as the editorial standard of
@washingtonpost: https://twitter.com/MaxBoot/status/1161700989109514241 …Dan McLaughlin added,
This Tweet is unavailable.8 replies 7 retweets 39 likesShow this thread -
Wait, so his entire defense seems to be that you're mad and that somehow justifies mischaracterizing out-of-context quotes as defending the same thinking behind mass murder? If you defend yourself, you're guilty. If you don't, you're guilty. Classic kafkatrap.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
It's very Trumpian of him.
-
-
Right?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.