(The fact that I can cite a Wikipedia article concisely explaining this should be fairly convincing proof that the distinction is well-grasped outside the legal academy.)
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sentences starting with "Fun fact" are generally out to misrepresent something
-
Sentences originating from an account using the identifier
@baseballcrank are generally out to misrepresent something.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is actually one of the better articles I’ve ever read on Wikipedia. Thanks for sharing to both of you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dan thank God Trump was able to replace Scalia with Gorsuch despite the best efforts of Nevertrumpers
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
-
-
There is no such thing as anything, constutionalist, originalist? It’s all garbage and politics. Most people in this country don’t understand how the constitution was “approved”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Soooo, does that mean a popular vote amongst all citizens should make federal policy decisions?
-
I’ll also point out that “Originalism” suggests that the original intent holds supreme bc we haven’t had any better ideas since 1787.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.