I say this respectfully, but one does not get to support President Trump and then lecture the rest of us on the morals that undergird an ordered, stable society.
I'm not the boss & he hasn't written on the site in a decade.
-
-
I can appreciate that, which is why people shouldn't hold that against you. But also, why keep him up as a contributor emeritus or whatever considering his current, uh, trajectory? I agree it's a silly point, but I wasn't the one that rang the "look at your contributors" bell.
-
tl;dr: should an insistence on keeping Dinesh on the masthead "tell us everything we need to know" about NRO's standards? I mean, maybe? It didn't at all on my end, but that seems to be what you're advocating here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Should probably take his name off the masthead then, yeah?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Three years, ten years, precision is overrated. We're being too literal and not acknowledging the spirit of his argument (confession: still not sure I get it).
- Show replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.