Note to Judges: Having Trump as POTUS is bad enough. Please don't make things worse by twisting the law or abusing your discretion just to rule against him. Thanks.
-
-
-
Replying to @EricColumbus
Juliana, emoluments cases, DACA, contraception mandate rules, etc. There are far more than there should be.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @jadler1969 @EricColumbus
Which contraception mandate rules one, the case in the 3rd?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @varadmehta @EricColumbus
Yup. Some parts of the case are difficult, but opinion was weak.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jadler1969 @EricColumbus
Is there a circuit split? This seems like something SCOTUS would take. And could it be reversed en banc since it's 8-6 now?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @varadmehta @EricColumbus
Not yet. SCOTUS could take on national injunction issue alone
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Whole point of national injunctions is to prevent Circuit splits.
3:41 PM - 19 Jul 2019
1 reply
0 retweets
4 likes
-
-
Replying to @baseballcrank @jadler1969 and
That's a piss poor reason. What happens in the Ninth Circuit should stay in the Ninth Circuit, etc.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.