This Lawrence Lessig column, ostensibly about gerrymandering, could not possibly be a more transparent effort to sweet talk Chief Justice Roberts into upholding Roe v Wadehttps://beta.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/07/10/why-john-roberts-may-be-right-about-gerrymandering/?outputType=amp …
-
-
The central claim was sui generis re equal protection clause (different standards of counting) which was explicitly cabined as non precedential. Kind of odd, especially the sympathy to a 14th amendment equal protection argument by justices like Scalia never before so enamored.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.