This Lawrence Lessig column, ostensibly about gerrymandering, could not possibly be a more transparent effort to sweet talk Chief Justice Roberts into upholding Roe v Wadehttps://beta.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/07/10/why-john-roberts-may-be-right-about-gerrymandering/?outputType=amp …
-
-
But nobody thinks those cases are remotely equivalent—even Jonathan Adler, who contrived Burwell, but joined an amicus brief opposing this crackpot litigation now before the fifth circuit.
-
Other point I have to add here: you do understand that you could substitute “Bush v. Gore” as the case reference in your article and everything you wrote would be even more true. That was a case where SCOTUS explicitly wrote it was not precedential.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.