This Lawrence Lessig column, ostensibly about gerrymandering, could not possibly be a more transparent effort to sweet talk Chief Justice Roberts into upholding Roe v Wadehttps://beta.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/07/10/why-john-roberts-may-be-right-about-gerrymandering/?outputType=amp …
-
-
For all the talk about how Kennedy was a “swing” Justice, he actually was fairly predictable and consistent. Roberts “swings” on big decisions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's just baffling to me why counting citizens is a problem. The very people who claim they're getting the short end of the stick financially should want to know who they're competing w/for jobs & who is getting the tax dollars we're paying in.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And you don’t believe that the conservative justices are responding to partisan pressure on major cases? Or Justice Scalia himself, at the point when, toward the end of his life, he was citing Fox News in oral arguments and said he had stopped reading the Post or the Times?
-
There is a major difference between "this person is open to persuasion by hearing facts" - which is true of everyone - and "this person can be deterred or seduced by what people say about the legitimacy of his decisions or the Court, or threats to the Court's future."
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And right wing republican judges have forfeited their independence to take orders from the GOP. GOOD WORK
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It relates to the legitimacy of the institution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He would know
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.