No, the history of how the Senate has acted on presidential-election-year SCOTUS nominations when the opposing party controls the Senate is not "invented," nor would it be contradicted by a 2020 nom. I've done the research: https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/03/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-nominee-rejections-politics-has-lot-do-it/ … https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/it-doesnt-matter-garland-didnt-get-hearing/ … https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1143963821788344320 …
-
-
This is not the way politics works. McConnell knew the outcome already, everything else is patching together the rhetorical case for it. You, on the other hand, feign to stand for certain principles. Principles don't come from spreadsheets
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Amazing how Dan’s preferred party is always vindicated by his preferred history.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.