1. This whole argument illustrates why dunking on the hapless @DineshDSouza - who never says anything, even when he's generally in the right, without including an easily-checked falsehood - loses the forest for the trees.
https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1136990695892426752 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
2. No serious historian disputes that, broadly speaking, in 1860 the Democrats were the pro-slavery party, or that the Republicans were the anti-slavery party. (Both parties were internally divided on many slavery-related issues). D'Souza being wrong (again!) doesn't change that.
4 replies 0 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
3. Demonstrating D'Souza's lack of factual credibility is a worthwhile project, but at a certain point, returning endlessly to that well loses any relevance to the world of facts & ideas debated by serious people.pic.twitter.com/8405FqQKQk
4 replies 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @baseballcrank @DineshDSouza
Where again was the Republican Party founded and why did 3 other parties come together to found it. You don’t know the answer so I won’t wait for a reply.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @JosephGG @DineshDSouza
...and your point is what? None of this is news to me. I've been writing about the Lincoln roots of the GOP for years.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank @DineshDSouza
You forgot that Northern Democrats were the third group to form the Republican Party. (Maybe you need a fact checker)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Where did I say something incorrect? I'm still unclear what your point is.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.