This is a maddeningly unspecific argument, and much depends on how one defines "the imperial presidency." Presidents do not have the authority to make law by executive fiat. But all three branches have implied authority that flows from their explicitly granted authority.https://twitter.com/nicholas_bagley/status/1135560268749115392 …
Happy to dive into it. My criticism of the Atlantic piece for inadequately explaining it stands, however.
-
-
I’m puzzled by the idea that this is unclear. But I also understand that it’s hard to back down on Twitter. Would be interested in any reactions on the work itself; you’d be one of the first conservatives to offer substantive comments in almost a year of circulating the draft.pic.twitter.com/gin8mWUVxV
-
My typical complaint is with the oversimplified framing of executive power issues. I'm sincere that I was disappointed that the article gave me nothing concrete to agree or disagree with. But will review the article when I get a chance.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.