This is a maddeningly unspecific argument, and much depends on how one defines "the imperial presidency." Presidents do not have the authority to make law by executive fiat. But all three branches have implied authority that flows from their explicitly granted authority.https://twitter.com/nicholas_bagley/status/1135560268749115392 …
I've been reading scholarship & debates on this stuff for years, I was hoping for an article that actually delivered the concrete argument it promised. What is and is not part of properly-understood Article II authority - as with Article I - is often a quite specific question.
-
-
Have I got the piece for you! https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3328945 …
-
Or if you’d prefer a more midsize exposition, here’s a series of blog posts:https://reason.com/2019/03/04/article-ii-vests-the-executive-power-not/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.